The July 31, 2015, report from the U.S. Labor
Department sounds ominous: Second quarter salaries and benefits for private
sector workers grew at the slowest pace in the past thirty-three years. Moreover, it appears companies are able to
find workers they need without boosting pay, a sign the job market remains
mired in the Great Recession. Nonetheless,
federal spokesmen from President Obama on down repeatedly laud the nation’s
vibrant economy and extol an unemployment rate currently at 5.3%—all as millions
of Americans search vainly for suitable jobs, while millions more have simply
given up looking.
How is it possible for the official unemployment
rate to be in the 5% range while perhaps 20% or more of employable adults
remain unable to find work? It’s because
of the gimmickry which the Labor Department employs in the counting. By employing an official definition of
unemployment as only “persons without jobs that have actively looked for work
within the past four weeks,” they may ignore the vast bulk of jobless
citizens. This doesn’t help put anyone
to work, but it makes the administration look good—which is what the political
business is all about.
Playing games with the economy is nothing
new. It’s been done by ruling
establishments for the full span of recorded history. A recent example: The German Weimar Republic sought
to pay huge First World War reparation obligations by merely creating
printing-press money. The result: The
cost to mail a letter rose from 5 marks in 1921 to 20 billion marks by 1923. Another illustration: Before the U.S.
government began simply throwing money at the Great Depression of the 1930s,
the slump was initially denied by then President Herbert Hoover when he
famously declared that “Prosperity is just around the corner”—a corner which
took a full decade to round.
What can the citizenry do to remedy the
problem? I’m sorry to report that as a
group, nothing much. Prosperity is not a
collective endeavor; it must be a personal accomplishment. This was never better expressed than by an
unnamed man who, during an earlier recession, declared: It’s every rat for himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment