Saturday, February 20, 2016

THE SUPREME COURT IN FLUX


With the recent death of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the presidential campaign under way has descended into chaos.  What had been regarded as a five-to-four court is no more.  With President Obama’s statement that he will soon submit his choice for a successor—requiring Senate confirmation—Republican Senate leaders are in a state of bewilderment as to how to handle such a nomination.


The Court is now inexorably split along partisan lines.  Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Breyer and Kagan may be expected to consistently cast their votes favoring Democratic policies, whereas Justices Roberts, Thomas, and Alito invariably side with the Republican points of view—often leaving moderately conservative Justice Kennedy as the swing vote.  All controversial political decisions will likely split on a four-to-four vote, meaning no effective Supreme Court action on anything controversial.  And of course, this is the way judicial decisions are traditionally determined.  In analyzing the legality of any contentious matter, biases are dredged up and past experiences revisited, as each jurist ruminates on what he or she personally favors.  This is how precedents are established and the U.S. Constitution interpreted.  Whatever our Founding Fathers had envisaged as fundamental principles of sound government has been long buried in the ash heap of the past.

 

My advice to Republican leaders: Review the record of whomever the President nominates to replace Justice Scalia and, unless the choice is thoroughly objectionable, approve confirmation.  The alternative may be far worse, for in the event the Republican Party selects—as is quite possible—a buffoon as its presidential nominee, it could result in the election of both a president as well as the senate majority from the Democratic Party.  In this case, all judicial appointments for at least the next four years will be of persons whose attitudes conform to those which Republicans generally oppose.


Lest any of you think otherwise, I don’t consider our country or its laws to be in any way inferior to those found elsewhere.  Injustices that occur in our established hierarchy and which strain the social fabric are merely the end product of a society of flawed humans.  Despite our imperfections, we’ve developed a remarkable nation and a set of laws and procedures which are the envy of the world.  That we haven’t achieved perfection can’t be blamed on anyone in particular.


                                       

If you enjoy this weekly Straight Talk by Al Jacobs, you’re invited to check out my monthly Financial Newsletter, as well as my new book, The Road to Prosperity


                                       


No comments:

Post a Comment